![]() So thanks for posting, ArialBurnz, but I'm afraid you've only just scraped the surface! Bob's method of doing multiple passes at different rates is definitely the way to do with Audition's NR, but you will always get better results in terms of remaining artefacts from higher FFT settings. The downside of course is that processing takes significantly longer. The higher FFT sizes mean that signal slices with HF in get dealt with much more accurately, hence less 'bubbly' noise. The reason for this is that you get many samples of higher frequency sound within the wider window, and the processing simply can't do anything with it. Since the FFT size essentially determines the window width, lower settings are really only much use on low frequency noise, and they are the ones responsible for most of the strange sounds you hear in the rest of the frequency range. You can get way better results from much higher settings, almost regardless of what sort of noise it is. ![]() In fact, you generally don't want to take off very much at all at FFT4096. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |